I Know and Am Persuaded…

While Saint Patrick wasn’t the first person to bring the gospel to Ireland, he was certainly the most beloved person to do so. Medieval Irish historians, Philip Freeman claims, loved Patrick so much that they attempted to downplay any missionaries sent before him so as to make his actions all the more amazing.

But what made Patrick so much different than his brothers?

After all, many of Patrick’s brothers would have been better versed in Latin and schooling, would have been under the instruction of the church for longer, would have been more confident speakers.

But Patrick is the one best remembered today.

Perhaps this isn’t so much because of what he did, but what he didn’t do. As Malachy McCourt says in his History of Ireland, “one of Patrick’s strengths in Ireland was his ability to integrate the Gaelic culture with the Christianity he was trying to bring. He did not, as other missionaries in other places would later, condemn the Celts as ignorant infidels or uncouth pagans. Instead, he took the Druidic world and tried to explain it in Christian terms.”

This, I think, is incredibly important.

In Acts 17:16-34, we find Paul in Athens. Now Paul’s “spirit was provoked” at the sight of the idols that filled the city of Athens, but not once did he think of the Athenians as lower than himself. He “reasons” with the people of Athens and when speaking in the Areopagus, Paul begins by praising them.

“Men of Athens,” he says, “I perceive that in every way you are very religious. For as I passed along and observed the objects of your woship, I found also an altar with this inscription, ‘to the unknown god.’ What therefore you worship as unknown, this I proclaim to you.”

Paul observes the culture of Athens and instead of declaring it heathenish, he finds God hiding in it. As he says in Romans 1:20, “[God’s] invisible attributes, namely his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever  since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made.”

Patrick, I think, understood that God wasn’t the God of Rome, just as Paul knew that “[God] does not live in temples made by man.” In every culture, in every science, in every genre, God is lying there in wait.

Although we follow Christ, although we are one body, we are still individuals. Our cultures have shaped us, our experiences have shaped us and (like as not) our families have shaped us. Often, we make assumptions about the laws of the scripture that aren’t there.

Patrick, for example, could have condemned Irish culture because it was nothing like his own. He could have gone in assuming that the way of the Roman church was the only way. But he didn’t. He looked to find where God was.

I think this is what we are called to do.

Every movie we watch, every book we read, every class we take, we have to look for God in them–even if it isn’t a Christian movie, book or class. Just because something is “Christian” doesn’t make it right.

In regard to non-christian books, John Calvin wrote, “in reading profane authors, the admirable light of truth in them should remind us that the human mind, however much fallen and perverted from its original integrity, is still adorned and invested with admirable gifts from its Creator.”

Calvin goes on to say that  condemning non-Christian literature isn’t just a choice, it’s actually an insult to God.

“If we reflect that the Spirit of God is the only fountain of truth, we will be careful, as we would to avoid offering insult to him, not to reject or condemn truth wherever it appears. In despising the gifts, we despise the giver.”

This doesn’t mean that you should read every book ever written by men, but that you should think twice before condemning them or claiming that they couldn’t be used for God’s glory. The same goes for different cultures or philosophies or abilities. Everything is given by God. Gifts will, of course, be perverted when they are used without God’s purpose in mind, but God can still use this for his glory.

As Paul says in Romans 14:14 “I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself.”

Saint Patrick knew and was persuaded. Are you?

Importance of Discipline

“Even the dippiest of us can be a writer,” Harlan Ellison says, “the trick is not in becoming a writer, it is in staying a writer.”

The moment I stepped foot in school, teachers were set on immersing me in the idea that I could become anyone and do anything I wanted to do–the belief that Americans have long flocked to. Anyone can become rich if they try hard enough. Anyone can become famous. As I grew up with this philosophy, I’m inclined to believe that it is true–although I think most people forget the most vital part of this success formula.

You need to work hard.

If you want to become a successful doctor you need to study your heart out. If you want to amaze the world with your art you need to paint until your hands fall off. If you want to become a best selling author you need to spend your every moment reading and writing.

And you need to make time for practicing these things every day.

Some days what you study won’t make sense. Some days you won’t know what to paint. Some days everything you write will be horrible.

But you need to practice. Daily.

You can’t win a race if you don’t practice. You can’t swim across channels if you don’t practice in lakes and pools.

So why should writing be any different? Why should medicine?

What makes a man great is not what he is born with but what he forces himself through every day.

The Japanese have a philosophy known as Kaizen, a philosophy which stresses the idea of constant improvement. It isn’t enough to push improvement in small bursts–it has to be constant. Daily. Disciplined.

As Authors, We Must Be Careful

In their book, The Myth of the American Superhero, John Shelton Lawrence and Robert Jewett discuss something they call “the Werther effect.”

In the Werther effect a [reader or audience member] (a) experiences a work of fantasy within a secular context that (b) helps to shape the reader/viewer’s sense of what is real and desirable, in such a way that , (c) the reader/viewer takes actions consistent with the vision inspired by the interaction between his own fantasy and that popular entertainment. (Myth, 10)

In other words, the readers (or audience members) experience the story in a personal way and shape their opinions, beliefs and desires from these false experiences as they would real ones. For example, if there is a movie or novel that promotes war, the Werther effect would instill upon its readers/viewers this pro-war sentiment. The same goes for anti-religion or anti-establishment–through the Werther effect, any philosophy–even if not consciously propaganda–is absorbed and adopted by the readers/viewers.

The namesake for this effect comes from an eighteenth century author, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, who wrote a story about a young man named Werther. Now Werther was a romantic fellow who only had eyes for one woman–and she denies him. So he commits suicide. “Within a decade of this novel’s publication,” the authors explain, “it had become an international sensation.” (Myth, 10) Young people loved the book–they could relate well to the protagonist and his deep desires for another. In fact, they loved the book so much, they could relate to the protagonist so well, that they decided to immitate him.

They committed suicide.

“All over Europe large numbers of young people committed suicide with a copy of the book clutched in their hands or buried in a pocket.” (Myth, 9) Walter Kaufman explains.

That is why Lawrence and Jewett call their condition “the Werther effect.”

Every book–however cliche and contrived–has a philosophy to it. Harry Potter, among other things, stresses the importance of equality, The Dresden Files praises the strength and cunning of the individual, Beowulf teaches the qualities of a “good king”–no book is without its Philosophy. A good book, however, often creates its own Werther effect–the readers relate to the main character, live through the story themselves, and adopt the character’s own conclusions.

This is why we as authors must be careful.

Words are powerful. Powerful enough to destroy establishments, change cultures and take lives. We must be careful what we write, what we promote, in case our readers experience a Werther Effect when reading our work.

Poor Johanne Goethe was held accountable for all of his readers that committed suicide. Preachers, families, friends, all of them chastised him and threw the blame of these suicides on his shoulders. Goethe hadn’t wanted to promote suicide–of course he hadn’t–but it was his writing that twisted these youth’s hearts to the point of suicide. It was his writing. What a terrible thing to live with.

As authors we must be careful. We aren’t simply writing something we find “fun” or “interesting.” We are writing a scenario for our readers to live through, giving them a chance to “walk a mile in someone else’s shoes.” They gleen their own conclusions, their own beliefs, from what they read, but we need to be very careful as to what we promote. We don’t want it blowing back in our faces.

What I Learned From Reading “The Shining”

Oh boy, where to start. There were so many things in this book that I learned from–probably because I had trouble putting the book down as a reader. Stephen King knows how to work suspense, that’s for sure. I would plan on reading three chapters and stop for the day, but he’d build up so much tension, so much suspense that I had to read on. One more chapters, two more chapters… I almost wasn’t sorry that I went to work sleep deprived.

Almost.

1) Always get people invested in your characters

I loved each and everyone one of King’s characters in The Shining even though they were hardly perfect. Jack’s temper and Wendy’s naggy-ness (word?) did bring quite a bit of judgement on their characters, but they were so human. I could feel Jack’s desperation to stay sober and calm for his family and could relate to Wendy’s need to have a semi-normal family.

I absolutely loved them and so when conflicts arose (Jack losing his mind to the house, Wendy and Danny’s nearly fruitless attempts to survive) I suffered with them. I silently urged Jack on as he battled with temptation and I think my heart froze as I read about the horrors of Room 217 and Danny’s narrow escape from the horrors on the playground.

I wanted the characters to be happy, to survive.

That’s why it’s important to spend the time to acquaint the readers with the characters–a book with loveable characters practically reads itself. And I don’t think the characters have to be perfect either–but there has to be something in them that we can relate to, that we love.

2) Never make things too easy

It was impossible to put the book down when any of the characters were staring death in the face.

Impossible.

I’m the kind of person who skips to the end of the book at the first sign of tension, but I still had to read on during conflicts. Even if I know the ending, I don’t yet know how things turn out that way. If the conflict is boring, if the answer to the conflict is obvious, I shrug my shoulders and give up on the book.

Sure perfect characters are easy to write and sometimes it’s satisfying to keep conflicts small and easy for them to solve–but those are the most boring stories to read. The best books–the ones I have to devote an entire day to reading because I know I won’t be able to set them down–are the ones where the characters MESS UP, where they’re thrown in the middle of hell and have to find their way out.

Of course, as a Christian, I don’t agree with the solution of non-Christian authors. They think that men can solve the problem. That if we gird our loins and think outside the box, we can do anything. I don’t think so. I can’t think so. It’s insanely fun to read, sure, but I know the only one who can get you out of a hole is God, so it will be interesting to figure out how to create tension in a Christian novel.

3) Evil is more terrifying when it’s human

This I don’t think King emphasized, though he did employ it. He gave Jack a personality, a character, a past. Jack was a person. A person with flaws, sure, but a person, none-the-less.

And he succumbed to the house’s corruption and malice. It was terrifying to see him do so too. I love how the evil seeps into his brain through the house and yet he accepts these warped ideas without a second thought.

Beautiful.

I do think it might have been more terrifying if the House (or, rather, Hotel, I suppose) had a hold on him, but it hadn’t killed Jack. If each of his choices had been fully his–even the one to kill his son. That would have been terrifying–especially if King had created a rational path between the loving father and the murderer rather than falling into dementia and irrational thought.

Still, his methods were terrifying and I learned a TON.

There’s so much I still want to touch on, but I need to be sure that I don’t skip another night’s sleep for this book. 🙂

Newer entries »